Desigualdad y estancamiento por diseño de políticas: el negacionismo predominante y sus peligrosas consecuencias políticas
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://www.eltrimestreeconomico.com.mx/index.php/te/index
Nota: la licencia de creative commons sólo aplica para la sección Artículos, para el contenido de las otras secciones, véase cada texto.
Métricas PlumX
Citas
Arrow, K. J., y Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22, 265-90.
Eggertsson, G. B., y Krugman, P. (2012). Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1469-1513.
Friedman, M. (1962 / 2002). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(mayo), 1-17.
Kahn, G. A., y Palmer, A. (2016). Monetary policy at the zero lower bound: Revelations from the fomc’s summary of economic projections. Economic Review, primer trimestre, 5-37.
Krugman, P. (2013a). Inequality and recovery. Nueva York: The New York Times, 20 de enero. Recuperado de: https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/inequality-and-recovery/
Krugman, P. (2013b). Why inequality matters. Nueva York: The New York Times, 16 de diciembre, A25. Recuperado de: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/opinion/krugman-why-inequality-matters.html
Marx, K., y Engels, F. (1845/1932). The German Ideology. Moscú: Marx-Engels Institute.
Mirowski, P. (2010). The great mortification: Economists responses to the crisis of 2007 – (and counting). The Hedgehog Review, 12, 28-41.
Palley, T. I. (1997). The academic jungle: Social practice and the survival of economic ideas. Review of Radical Political Economics, 29, 22-33.
Palley, T. I. (2008). Breaking the neoclassical monopoly in economics. Project Syndicate Recuperado de: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/breaking-the-neoclassical-monopoly-in-economics?barrier=accesspaylog [Disponible también en: Palley, T. I. (2012). The economic crisis: Notes from the underground. Washington, D. C.: CreateSpace.]
Palley, T. I. (2009). America’s exhausted paradigm: Macroeconomic causes of the financial crisis and Great Recession. Washington, D. C.: New America Foundation. Recuperado de: http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/conference_papers/SAFER/Palley_Americ as_Exhausted_Paradigm.pdf
Palley, T. I. (2012). From financial crisis to stagnation: The destruction of shared prosperity and the role of economics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Palley, T. I. (2013). Gattopardo economics: The crisis and the mainstream response of change that keeps things the same. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 10(2), 193-206.
Palley, T. I. (2016). Zero lower bound (zlb) economics: The fallacy of new keynesian explanations of stagnation (documento de trabajo imk 164). Düsseldorf: Institute for Macroeconomics.
Palley, T. I., y Horn, G. A. (eds.) (2013). Restoring shared prosperity: A policy agenda from leading keynesian economists. Recuperado de: http://www.thomaspalley.com/docs/research/restoring_shared_prosperity.pdf
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Summers, L. (2014). U. S. economic prospects: Secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound. Business Economics, 49, 65-73.
Taylor. J. B. (2007). Housing and monetary policy (documento de trabajo 13682).Washington, D. C.: NBER.
Taylor. J. B. (2009). How government created the financial crisis. Nueva York: Wall Street Journal. Recuperado de: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123414310280561945